Blog - NTZ Law

Common Injuries Resulting from Train Accidents and Legal Options

Train Accidents in America: Everything Passengers & Railroad Workers Need to Know

Train accidents, while less frequent than other types of transportation accidents, can result in severe and sometimes catastrophic injuries. Victims of train accidents may face a range of injuries that may alter lives — or even cause tragedy.

In the aftermath of such an accident, it’s crucial for victims and their families to understand their legal rights and options. Depending on the circumstances, they may be entitled to financial compensation for their injuries and the expenses associated with healing and lost wages.

Legal claims in train accidents can be complex, involving multiple parties like the train operator, rail company, or even government entities. Therefore, it’s often advisable for injury victims to consult with a legal professional who specializes in this area to navigate the intricacies of transportation law and to ensure their rights are fully protected. Your personal injury lawyer can be of tremendous value when seeking justice for accidents involving train collisions that result in injury or death.

Top 3 Causes of Railroad Accidents in the U.S

Human Error:

This is one of the most common causes of railroad accidents. It includes mistakes made by train operators, such as speeding, ignoring signals, or operating the train while fatigued or under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Errors by other employees responsible for maintenance, signal operation, or track inspection also fall under this category.

Track Defects:

Poorly maintained or defective tracks are a significant cause of train accidents. Issues such as broken rails, improper alignment, or inadequate track bed support can lead to derailments or other accidents. Another common source of accidents are railroad crossings. Missing or broken safety lights and barriers contribute to hundreds of cases of serious personal injury each year. Regular maintenance and inspections are crucial to prevent track-related incidents.

Equipment Failure:

Malfunctioning equipment, including issues with the train’s mechanical parts like brakes, wheels, or axles, can lead to accidents. Although modern trains are equipped with various safety features, mechanical failures can still occur due to manufacturing defects, wear and tear, or inadequate maintenance. Many train accidents are preventable if factors like equipment negligence and neglect are addressed before they can harm passengers or railroad workers.

It’s important to note that while these are common causes, each railroad accident has its unique circumstances and contributing factors. Regulatory bodies like the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) in the U.S. continuously work to monitor and improve railroad safety to reduce these types of accidents.

Types of Train Accident Injuries

The most common types of injuries associated with train accidents can vary in severity, ranging from minor to life-threatening. These include:

Whiplash and Soft Tissue Injuries: These injuries are common in less severe accidents, especially for passengers. Whiplash occurs due to the sudden jerking movement of the head and neck, while soft tissue injuries involve damage to muscles, ligaments, and tendons.
Broken Bones and Fractures: The impact and force of a train accident can easily cause broken bones and fractures. These injuries can range from simple fractures that may heal with time to more complex ones requiring surgical intervention.
Head Injuries and Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBIs): These are among the more serious injuries and can occur from a direct blow to the head or a violent shake. TBIs can range from mild concussions to severe brain damage, potentially leading to long-term cognitive and physical impairments.
Spinal Cord Injuries and Paralysis: Spinal cord injuries can result from the traumatic impact of a train accident, potentially leading to temporary or permanent paralysis, depending on the area and severity of the injury.
Cuts and Lacerations: Shattered glass, metal debris, and other sharp objects commonly found in train wrecks can cause cuts and lacerations, which may range from minor to severe.
Internal Injuries: These include internal bleeding and damage to internal organs. They can be life-threatening and require immediate medical attention.
Psychological Trauma: Beyond physical injuries, victims of train accidents may also suffer from psychological trauma such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression.
Burns: In cases where fires or explosions occur as part of the accident, victims may suffer from burns, which can range in severity.

It’s important for victims of train accidents to seek immediate medical attention, as some injuries, particularly internal ones, may not be immediately apparent.

Human Error: Train Accidents Caused by Conductor Negligence

Human error or negligence plays a crucial role in causing train accidents, often with serious outcomes. Operator errors, such as fatigue, distraction, or operating under the influence, can lead to speeding, misjudgment of distances, or improper brake application. Poor maintenance of trains and tracks can also lead to critical failures. Inadequate training of operators and railway staff is another contributing factor, as it can result in misinterpretation of safety protocols and emergency responses.

Additionally, signal and communication errors, often due to misreading signals or equipment malfunctions, can cause collisions and derailments. Negligence in following safety protocols, as well as improper loading of freight trains, further contribute to these accidents. Distractions, especially from electronic devices, also pose a significant risk in modern railway operations. Thus, a combination of these human-related factors can significantly increase the likelihood of train accidents.

Railroad Crossing Accidents: The Most Common Type of Train Collision

Accidents involving railroad crossings are often serious and occur when vehicles, pedestrians, or cyclists intersect with an oncoming train. Common causes include failure to observe warning signals, misjudgment of the train’s speed and distance, or malfunctioning crossing signals.

Visibility issues, such as obstructed views or poor lighting, also contribute. These accidents can be particularly severe due to the train’s size and speed, often resulting in significant injuries or fatalities. Prevention efforts focus on improving crossing safety features, public awareness campaigns, and enforcing laws related to railroad crossing usage.

Federal Railroad Administration Responsibility

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is the federal agency responsible for regulating the railroad industry. Its core function is to help prevent railroad track issues, railroad related deaths, and human error from causing serious injury or death.

Regulation and Oversight: The FRA establishes and enforces safety regulations for the nation’s railroad industry. This includes rules regarding track maintenance, train operation, signal systems, and equipment safety standards.
Inspections and Monitoring: Regular inspections of railroads, equipment, and infrastructure are conducted to ensure compliance with safety standards. The FRA also monitors railroad operations and maintenance activities.
Research and Development: The FRA invests in research to advance railway safety technology. This includes developing safer train cars, improving track integrity, and enhancing signaling systems.
Training and Education: The FRA provides training programs for freight railroad employees to promote safety awareness and ensure workers are well-informed about safety practices and regulations.
Data Analysis and Risk Reduction: The FRA analyzes accident data to identify trends and areas of risk. Based on this analysis, they implement targeted safety initiatives and campaigns to address identified issues.

Even with these protections in place, and stringent restrictions followed by railroads, railroad companies, and workers, injuries can and do occur. When they do, they can alter lives permanently.

Advocating for the Rights of Railroad Passengers

A train accident lawyer acts as an advocate for victim rights in several key ways:

Legal Representation: They provide legal representation to victims, ensuring their rights are protected throughout the legal process. This includes negotiating with insurance companies and rail companies, and representing clients in court if necessary.
Expertise in Railroad Laws: Train accident lawyers possess specialized knowledge of railroad laws and regulations, which is crucial for understanding the complexities of train accident cases and determining liability.
Investigation and Evidence Gathering: They conduct thorough investigations to gather evidence, including witness statements, train and track inspection records, and accident reports. This helps in building a strong case for the victim.
Assessment of Damages: Lawyers assess the full extent of damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and future care needs. This ensures that victims receive fair compensation that reflects the true impact of the accident on their lives.
Negotiation Skills: Train accident lawyers are skilled negotiators, often securing settlements from the insurance company or other parties that adequately compensate victims without the need for a lengthy trial.
Guidance and Support: They provide guidance and support to victims and their families throughout the legal process, helping them understand their rights and the steps involved in pursuing a claim. This is especially true if surviving family members wish to file a wrongful death lawsuit against whoever is responsible.
Advocacy for Safety Changes: Beyond individual cases, train accident lawyers often advocate for broader safety changes in the industry to prevent future accidents. From preventing hazardous materials aboard trains, more strict regulations for freight railroads, or lessening the risks of derailment, lawyers may petition the state or federal Department of Transportation to create change.

In essence, a train accident lawyer is crucial in navigating the legal complexities following a train accident, ensuring that victims’ rights are upheld and they receive the compensation and justice they deserve.

Who Do I Contact If I Was Injured in a Train Accident?

If you were involved in a train accident, it’s important to take certain steps to ensure your safety and protect your legal rights:

First, seek medical attention: Medical care is the critical aspect that can help people get the treatment they need as soon as possible. This helps to establish a record of injuries, which may be used later by an attorney representing you in a lawsuit or settlement with the railroad company or other responsible party.

Next, contact a Train Accident Lawyer: Consider consulting with a lawyer who specializes in train accidents. They can provide legal advice, help you understand your rights, and guide you through the process of seeking compensation.

If you or someone you love, like a family member or spouse, is injured through no fault of your own, and local authorities are proving less than helpful, your personal injury attorney can help you restore what was lost to you. This can include financial compensation for lost wages, medical expenses, and pain and suffering.

Call a qualified train accident attorney today to learn more about your rights when you or someone you love has been injured in a train crash.

Choose a Leading Train Accident Law Firm

Comparing Personal Injury Settlements vs. Court Verdicts

When navigating the aftermath of a personal injury, individuals often face a critical decision: should they accept a settlement offer or take their case to court? This decision can significantly impact the compensation they receive, litigation costs, the duration of their legal journey, and their overall satisfaction with the outcome.

In this blog post, we will delve into the key differences between personal injury settlements and court verdicts, examining factors such as time, cost, risk, and potential compensation. Whether you’re seeking a quick resolution or aiming for the maximum possible compensation, understanding these differences is crucial in navigating the complex landscape of personal injury law.

What is a Personal Injury Claim?

A personal injury claim is a legal process used by individuals to seek compensation for harm suffered as a result of someone else’s negligence, recklessness, or intentional actions. This harm can be physical, emotional, or both, and the claim aims to recover financial compensation to cover various losses and expenses resulting from the injury.

Personal injury claims can arise from a wide variety of situations, including but not limited to:

Car accidents: Where one driver’s negligence causes injury to another person.
Slip and fall accidents: Where an individual is injured on someone else’s property due to unsafe conditions.
Medical malpractice: Where a healthcare professional’s failure to provide standard care results in injury or harm to a patient.
Product liability: Where defective or unsafe products cause injury to consumers.
Workplace accidents: Where employees are injured on the job due to unsafe working conditions or practices.

The process typically begins with the injured party (the plaintiff) filing a claim against the party believed to be at fault (the defendant). The goal is to demonstrate that the defendant’s actions or inactions directly led to the injury and that compensation is warranted to address the resultant harm and losses.

What is a Court Settlement?

This often happens before the case goes to trial or during the trial but before a final verdict is issued. In the context of personal injury law, a settlement involves the plaintiff (the injured party) agreeing to drop their lawsuit in exchange for a specific settlement amount of money or other terms of compensation offered by the defendant or their insurance company.

Settlement negotiations may occur at any point during the process, potentially leading to an agreement that avoids a trial. In other personal injury cases, the lawsuit and court trial may have already begun, yet the two parties come to an agreement instead of pursuing a verdict.

Once a settlement is agreed upon, it must often be approved by a judge, especially in cases involving minors or when the settlement concludes a lawsuit that has already been filed. After approval, the agreement is legally binding, and the lawsuit is dismissed.

Highlighting the Pros and Cons of Each Outcome

Personal injury cases often end in one of two ways: through a settlement agreement or by going to trial and obtaining a court verdict. Each route has its pros and cons, depending on the specifics of the case, the parties involved, and the goals of the plaintiff. Here’s an overview:

Settlements

Pros:

Quicker Resolution: Settlements typically resolve much faster than court cases, providing compensation to the injured party more quickly.
Less Expensive: Avoiding a trial saves on legal fees, court costs, and other expenses associated with litigation.
Privacy: Settlements are private agreements and can keep the details of the case and its resolution out of the public record.
Certainty: Both parties know the outcome immediately, avoiding the uncertainty of how a judge or jury might rule.
Flexibility: The parties can negotiate terms that a court might not have the authority to order, such as structured payments or confidentiality agreements.

Cons:

Potentially Lower Compensation: Settlement amounts may be lower than what could potentially be awarded by a jury verdict.
No Public Record: If a defendant’s negligence is particularly egregious, a plaintiff might prefer a public trial to expose the defendant’s actions.
No Legal Precedent: Settlements do not create legal precedents, which can be important for changing or clarifying laws.

Court Verdicts

Pros:

Possibility of Higher Compensation: Juries can award significant compensation, including punitive damages in some cases, which might exceed settlement offers.
Public Record: A trial’s outcome and the facts of the case become a matter of public record, which can be important for accountability.
Legal Precedent: Successful court cases can set or influence legal precedents, potentially affecting future cases.

Cons:

Time-consuming: Trials can take months or even years to conclude, delaying compensation.
Costly: The costs of going to trial (lawyer fees, court fees, etc.) are significant and increase the longer a case goes on.
Uncertainty: The outcome of a trial is uncertain; a plaintiff could end up with less than a settlement offer or even lose the case entirely.
Stressful: The trial process can be emotionally draining and stressful for the parties involved, requiring testimony and cross-examination.
Public Exposure: The details of the case, including personal information, are exposed in a public forum.

The choice between settling and going to trial depends on many factors, including the strength of the case, the parties’ willingness to negotiate, the desired speed of resolution, and the specific goals of the plaintiff. As with any legal issue, having experienced attorneys to consult with can spell the difference between an equitable settlement or nothing if the jury decides not to award damages.

How Do I Know I Have a Personal Injury Case?

Determining whether you have a personal injury case involves assessing several key factors related to the incident and the harm you’ve suffered. Understanding these components can help you decide whether it’s worthwhile to pursue legal action. Here’s a basic checklist to consider:

1. Negligence or Fault

Did someone else’s actions (or failure to act) cause your injury? To have a viable personal injury case, another party (individual, company, or entity) must be at fault due to negligence, recklessness, or intentional wrongdoing. Negligence means that the at-fault party failed to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would in a similar situation.

2. Injury and Damages

Did you suffer physical, emotional, or financial harm? You need to have sustained some form of injury or damage as a result of the incident. This can include physical injuries, emotional distress, medical expenses, lost wages, and other financial losses. Merely being involved in an incident where you could have been injured, but weren’t, typically does not qualify for a personal injury claim.

3. Causation

Is there a direct link between the other party’s fault and your injury? It must be clear that your injuries were directly caused by the other party’s actions or negligence. This connection is crucial for a personal injury case. All parties involved are evaluated for their role in action or inaction that led to someone else’s injury.

4. Evidence

Do you have evidence to support your claim? Evidence can include medical records, witness statements, photographs or videos of the incident or injury scene, police reports (for accidents), and any other documentation that supports your claim of negligence and damages.

5. Impact on Your Life

How has the injury affected your life? Consider the impact of the personal injury on your daily activities, work, mental health, and quality of life. Significant impacts can strengthen your case for compensation. Severe personal injuries are life-changing — and in worst-case scenarios can be fatal, leaving loved ones struggling to recover from their loss.

If you believe these factors apply to your situation, consulting with a personal injury lawyer can be a crucial next step. Personal injury lawyers offer free consultations to assess the merits of your case, explain your legal options, and outline the potential outcomes. A lawyer can help you understand the strength of your case, navigate the legal system, and work towards securing the compensation you deserve.

Key Benefits of Working with Personal Injury Attorneys

Working with a personal injury attorney can significantly enhance your chances of securing a fair resolution, whether your case ends in a settlement or goes to trial for a jury verdict. An experienced attorney not only navigates the complex legal landscape on your behalf but also leverages their expertise to advocate for your best interests.

Gathering Evidence in Personal Injury Cases

An attorney directs the investigation for a personal injury claim. This aspect of legal representation is crucial for building a strong case on behalf of the client.

Negotiating with the Insurance Company

An attorney will review insurance policies (both the client’s and the defendant’s) to understand coverage limits and identify all possible sources of compensation.

If the defendant’s insurance company refuses to pay out for a claim, the attorney will typically negotiate favorable terms for all parties involved, or may choose to pursue a personal injury lawsuit to recover fair compensation for his or her client — the personal injury victim or personal injury victims or family members.

Representing Your Interests Inside and Out of the Courtroom

Attorneys frequently consult with various experts to strengthen the case. These experts might include medical professionals to testify about the extent and impact of injuries, accident reconstruction specialists to demonstrate how the incident occurred, and economists to quantify economic losses like lost wages and future earning capacity of the injured victim.

For out of court settlements or a jury trial, the attorney will help to protect your rights as an injury victim. Some of the most experienced personal injury attorneys serve as powerful victim advocates, giving voice to those hurt or incapacitated through no fault of their own.

Speak to a Personal Injury Lawyer Today

If you or a loved one has experienced an injury caused through no fault of your own, time is of the essence. After seeking medical care, call a NYC personal injury attorney as soon as possible. Your attorney’s office can help you determine whether you have a case, start the legal ball rolling and file a claim on your behalf, and represent you every step of the way.

Choosing the Right Attorney for Your Medical Malpractice Case

Choosing the right attorney for your medical malpractice case is a crucial step in ensuring you receive the justice and compensation you deserve. Navigating the complex and often overwhelming world of medical malpractice law requires not just any lawyer, but one who is deeply experienced and specialized in this field.

This blog aims to guide you through the intricate process of selecting an attorney who not only understands the nuances of medical malpractice laws but also empathizes with your situation. We will explore key factors such as experience, track record, communication skills, and client testimonials, to help you make an informed decision in your journey towards legal resolution and peace of mind.

What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional, such as a doctor, nurse, or other medical practitioner, fails to provide a standard of care that is considered acceptable and appropriate in the medical community, and as a result, a patient suffers harm or injury. This can involve errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare, or health management.

For a case to be considered medical malpractice, it must meet several established criteria:

Violation of the Standard of Care

There are certain medical standards recognized by the profession as being acceptable medical treatment. Patients have the right to expect to receive these standards. If it is determined that these standards have not been met, negligence may be established.

Injury Caused by Negligence

For a medical malpractice claim to be valid, it is not sufficient that a healthcare professional simply violated the standard of care. The patient must also prove that they sustained an injury that would not have occurred in the absence of negligence.

Significant or Long-Lasting Damage Caused by the Injury

Medical malpractice cases must show that significant damages resulted from an injury received due to medical negligence. This can include physical pain, mental anguish, additional medical bills, and lost work or earning capacity.

Common Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

Common types of medical malpractice lawsuits include:

Misdiagnosis or Delayed Diagnosis: This occurs when a healthcare professional incorrectly diagnoses a patient’s condition or fails to diagnose a serious condition for some time. Misdiagnosis can lead to incorrect treatment, delayed treatment, or no treatment at all, potentially causing harm to the patient.
Surgical Errors: These include mistakes made during surgery, such as operating on the wrong body part, leaving surgical instruments inside the patient’s body, or performing an incorrect surgical procedure. Surgical errors can result in severe complications or additional surgeries.
Medication Errors: This can involve prescribing the wrong medication, incorrect dosage, or administering the wrong drug. Medication errors can result in adverse drug interactions, allergic reactions, or failure to treat the medical condition.
Birth Injuries: These include injuries to the baby or mother during childbirth, which can result from medical negligence. Examples include failure to anticipate birth complications, failure to respond to fetal distress, and improper use of birth-assisting tools.
Failure to Treat: This occurs when a doctor correctly diagnoses a patient but fails to recommend or administer appropriate treatment, potentially leading to worsening of the patient’s condition.
Anesthesia Errors: These can be particularly dangerous, ranging from administering too much anesthesia to failing to monitor the patient’s vital signs or improperly intubating patients. These errors can result in serious injury, brain damage, or death.
Medical Product Liability: This involves defects in medical devices or pharmaceutical products that cause harm to patients. The liability may fall on the manufacturer or the healthcare provider who used the defective product.
Lack of Informed Consent: This happens when a healthcare provider fails to inform the patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a proposed treatment or procedure, and the patient would have refused the treatment had they been fully informed.

Each type of malpractice case has its unique challenges and requires specific evidence to prove negligence or error on the part of the healthcare provider.

Proving Your Case in a Medical Malpractice Lawsuit

Proving a medical malpractice claim typically involves establishing several key elements. An experienced personal injury or medical malpractice lawyer focuses on the following steps:

Establishing a Duty of Care: The lawyer must first demonstrate that there was a professional relationship between the patient and the healthcare provider, establishing that the provider owed a duty of care to the patient. This is usually straightforward, as it can be established through medical records showing that the provider was treating the patient.
Breach of Standard of Care: The lawyer must show that the healthcare provider breached the standard of care. The standard of care is typically defined as the level and type of care that a reasonably competent and skilled healthcare professional, with a similar background and in the same medical community, would have provided under similar circumstances. Expert testimony, usually from medical professionals in the same field as the defendant, is often used to establish what the standard of care should have been and how it was breached.
Causation: Proving causation is critical. The lawyer must demonstrate that the breach of standard of care directly caused the patient’s injury. This means showing that the harm would not have occurred if the standard of care had been met. Causation can be complex to prove, especially in cases where the patient had pre-existing conditions.
Damages: The lawyer must prove that the patient suffered actual harm as a result of the breach. This can include physical pain, mental anguish, additional medical expenses, lost wages, or a reduced ability to earn money in the future. Documentation of these damages is crucial and can include medical records, bills, employment records, and expert testimony on the future impacts of the injury.
Collecting and Presenting Evidence: This can involve obtaining and analyzing medical records, interviewing witnesses, collecting expert testimonies, and sometimes reconstructing the events leading to the malpractice. The lawyer must gather sufficient evidence to build a compelling case that the healthcare provider’s negligence caused harm to the patient.
Negotiating Settlements and Litigation: Many medical malpractice claims are settled out of court. Your lawyer may negotiate with the healthcare provider’s insurance company to reach a settlement. If a settlement cannot be reached, the case may go to trial, where the lawyer will present the evidence and arguments to a judge or jury.

Medical malpractice cases are often complex and require a deep understanding of both legal and medical issues. An experienced medical malpractice lawyer will have the resources and expertise necessary to navigate these challenges and advocate effectively on behalf of the patient.

Medical Malpractice Lawsuits vs. Personal Injury Claims

Medical malpractice lawsuits and personal injury claims are both types of legal claims for compensating individuals who have suffered harm due to someone else’s actions or negligence. However, there are key differences between them:

Nature of the Claim:

Medical Malpractice: This is a specific type of personal injury claim that arises from a healthcare provider’s failure to provide the standard of care, resulting in harm to the patient. It specifically deals with the professional negligence of doctors, nurses, therapists, and other medical professionals and facilities.
Personal Injury: This is a broader category that encompasses any claim where an individual is injured due to the negligence or intentional act of another person or entity. This includes, but is not limited to, car accidents, slip and fall accidents, workplace injuries, product liability, and more.

Standard of Care and Expert Testimony:

Medical Malpractice: The standard of care is a critical element. It refers to the level of care and skill that a reasonably competent health care professional in a similar practice and in a similar community would have provided under similar circumstances. Proving a breach of this standard often requires testimony from medical experts in the same field as the defendant.
Personal Injury: The focus is typically on proving negligence, which means showing that the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, breached that duty, and caused harm as a result. The standard of care can be more general and less specialized than in medical malpractice cases.

Regulatory Considerations:

Medical Malpractice: These cases are usually more complex, involving intricate medical information and requiring a deep understanding of both legal and medical issues. Additionally, many jurisdictions have specific regulations and procedural rules for medical malpractice claims, such as requiring a certificate of merit or a pre-suit investigation.
Personal Injury: While these cases can vary in complexity, many are more straightforward than medical malpractice claims. The legal processes and regulations are generally less stringent than those for medical malpractice.

Damages:

In both types of claims, plaintiffs can seek compensation for damages such as medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. However, in some jurisdictions, there may be caps on certain types of damages in medical malpractice cases, limiting the amount of compensation a plaintiff can receive. For personal injury cases, there may be similar caps, but these tend to be higher than their malpractice suit counterparts.

Limits on Time to File a Claim:

Both types of claims are subject to statutes of limitations, which vary by state. However, medical malpractice cases often have a shorter time frame within which a lawsuit must be filed, partly due to the complex nature of these cases and the need to preserve medical evidence.

How Do I Know I Have a Medical Malpractice Claim?

A medical malpractice attorney can help you determine whether or not you can file a medical malpractice suit by conducting a thorough assessment of your case, which typically involves several key steps:

Reviewing Medical Records: A lawyer will start by reviewing all relevant medical records to understand the medical treatment you received and the outcomes. This includes hospital records, treatment notes, test results, and any other documentation related to your care.
Consulting Medical Experts: Medical malpractice law is complex and often hinges on technical medical details. Lawyers frequently consult with medical experts to analyze your case. These experts can help determine whether the care you received fell below the accepted standard of care in the medical community and whether this breach caused your injury.
Evaluating the Standard of Care: The lawyer, often with the help of medical experts, will evaluate the standard of care that was appropriate for your situation. They will assess whether your medical provider acted in a way that a competent and reasonably skilled professional would have acted under similar circumstances.
Determining Causation: One of the most challenging aspects of a medical malpractice case is proving causation – that is, proving that the healthcare provider’s negligence directly caused your injury. A lawyer will work to establish a clear link between the breach of standard of care and your injury.
Assessing Damages: The lawyer will assess the extent of your injuries and other losses (like medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, etc.) to determine the potential value of your claim. This assessment is crucial for deciding whether a lawsuit is economically viable.
Understanding Legal Requirements and Deadlines: Claims involving medical malpractice are subject to various legal requirements and strict deadlines (statutes of limitations). A lawyer will help ensure that all necessary steps for medical malpractice suits are taken within the legal time frames.
Advising on Legal Strategy: Based on their assessment, a lawyer can advise you on the best legal strategy, whether it’s negotiating a settlement or proceeding to trial. They will provide guidance on the pros and cons of each approach and will do so throughout the medical malpractice litigation process.
Providing Representation and Support: If you decide to proceed with a claim, your lawyer will represent you throughout the legal process, from filing the lawsuit to negotiating settlements or advocating for you in court.

Overall, a lawyer’s role is to provide expertise and guidance, helping you to navigate the complexities of medical malpractice law and to make informed decisions about your case.

Legal Help with Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

If you or a loved one has been injured through medical malpractice, an experienced injury attorney is your key to beginning the recovery process. As an injured patient, you have specific rights. Your attorney can help you file a claim, represent you inside and out of the courtroom, and provide valuable guidance and advice.

For lawsuits alleging medical negligence, including medical errors, improper medical procedure, medication errors, or substandard medical care, call an experienced attorney today.

The Role of Witnesses in Police Brutality Cases

Witnesses play a crucial role in police brutality cases, providing firsthand accounts that can either support or refute allegations of misconduct. Witnesses, whether they are bystanders, victims, or fellow officers, offer valuable perspectives that can help to construct a comprehensive understanding of the incident in question.

Police Officer Brutality Cases: A Growing Concern

police brutality cases appear to be on the rise. Research published in Forbesindicates that from 1980 to 2019, 32,000 Americans were killed as a result of police violence, with the number of deaths due to police brutality in the United States having increased in recent years from 0.25 per 100,000 in the 1980s to approximately 0.34 per 100,000 after the year 2010. This data suggests a troubling trend towards an increase in incidents of police violence.

The issue was brought to a head in 2020 when George Floyd, a black man living in Minneapolis, Minnesota, died at the hands of police officers. For nearly nine minutes, an officer pressed his knee into Mr. Floyd’s neck, causing injuries that resulted in tragedy. Since then, organizations such as Black Lives Matter have been instrumental in documenting police officer encounters, collecting witness statements, and ensuring cops adhere to rigorous training and safety standards.

Police Brutality Witnesses: Their Stories

Witnesses to police brutality often share stories that are harrowing and deeply impactful, shedding light on instances of excessive force and abuse of power by law enforcement officers. These stories can vary widely in their specifics but commonly include several types of narratives:

Physical Violence: Accounts of physical violence, including beatings, shootings, and the use of excessive force during arrests or stops. Witnesses may describe how officers used unwarranted force against individuals, often leading to serious injuries or fatalities.
Psychological Abuse: Stories highlighting verbal abuse, intimidation, and threats used by police officers. Witnesses might recount how victims were subjected to racial slurs, unjust threats, or dehumanizing treatment during encounters with law enforcement.
Unlawful Searches and Seizures: Descriptions of illegal or unjustified searches of personal property, homes, or vehicles without proper search warrant or warrants or just cause. These narratives often emphasize the invasion of privacy and the feeling of powerlessness against authority figures.
Racial Profiling and Discrimination: Many witnesses share experiences that underscore the role of racial profiling in police encounters. These stories detail how individuals, particularly from minority communities, were targeted based on their race or ethnicity, leading to discriminatory treatment or violence.
Misuse of Non-Lethal Weapons: Accounts of the improper or excessive use of non-lethal weapons, such as tear gas, tasers, and rubber bullets, especially during protests or crowd control situations. Witnesses may describe the chaos and injury resulting from such actions, often in situations where the use of force was disproportionate to the threat.
Emotional and Community Impact: Beyond the immediate incidents of brutality, witnesses also share stories about the long-term emotional trauma and community impact. These narratives can include the fear and mistrust of law enforcement that develops within communities, particularly those that are disproportionately affected by police violence.

Witness accounts are vital in illuminating the realities of police brutality, contributing to public discourse and response, and fostering movements for justice and reform. Their stories not only document individual instances of abuse but also help to reveal systemic issues within law enforcement practice

Responsibilities of Police Officers

police officers are generally sworn to use non-lethal force only as necessary, adhering to principles of proportionality, legality, and necessity. The exact guidelines and policies governing the use of force vary by jurisdiction, but there are common principles and responsibilities that police officers must follow to prevent brutality:

Minimum Force: Officers are trained to use the minimum amount of force necessary to achieve a lawful objective. This means starting with verbal commands and, if necessary, escalating to non-lethal means before considering lethal force, and only if absolutely necessary to protect life.
De-escalation Techniques: Police are increasingly trained in de-escalation techniques aimed at reducing the need for force. This includes communication strategies, negotiation, and other methods to calm potentially volatile situations and avoid violence.
Proportionality: The force used must be proportional to the threat posed. This principle requires officers to assess the situation and use only the level of force appropriate to the threat level, ensuring that excessive force is not used in less threatening situations.
Accountability and Transparency: Officers are responsible for documenting and justifying the use of force. Body cameras and incident reports are tools used to ensure transparency and accountability in police actions, allowing for review and investigation of force incidents.
Training and Education: Police departments have a responsibility to provide ongoing training and education to officers on the appropriate use of force, legal standards, cultural competency, and other relevant topics to prevent brutality and misconduct.
Community Policing: Engaging with the community and building relationships can help prevent police brutality by fostering mutual respect and understanding. Community policing strategies encourage officers to work closely with the communities they serve to solve problems collaboratively.
Early Intervention Systems: Many police departments have implemented early intervention systems to identify officers who may be at risk of using excessive force. These systems can flag officers with multiple complaints or incidents and provide targeted training, counseling, or other interventions.
Legal and Disciplinary Actions: There are legal and disciplinary frameworks in place to address police misconduct. Officers found to have used excessive force can face disciplinary action, including suspension or termination, as well as legal consequences, including criminal charges.

Overall, the responsibility of police officers in preventing brutality is anchored in the commitment to protect and serve while respecting the rights and dignity of all individuals. By adhering to these principles and responsibilities, law enforcement agencies aim to maintain public trust and ensure the safety and well-being of both officers and citizens in the communities they serve.

What Should You Do if You Witness Police Brutality?

If you witness police brutality, there are several steps you can take to safely report the incident and contribute to accountability. It’s important to act responsibly and cautiously to protect yourself and others involved. Here’s what you can do:

Document the Incident: If it’s safe to do so, record the incident with your smartphone or camera, capturing video or photos from a safe distance. Ensure you do not interfere with the police operation. Audio recordings can also be valuable if it’s not possible to get a visual record.
Take Detailed Notes: As soon as possible, write down everything you remember about the incident, including the date, time, location, badge numbers of the officers involved, patrol car numbers, and the sequence of events. Note any details about the individuals involved, including their physical descriptions.
Look for Witnesses: If other people witnessed the incident, ask for their contact information. Having multiple accounts can strengthen the credibility of the report.
Report the Incident: Report the incident to the appropriate authorities. This can include:
- The police department’s internal affairs division or a civilian complaint board, if available.
- Local or national civil rights organizations that can provide guidance or legal support.
- The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) or similar organizations that deal with civil rights issues.
Use Caution When Sharing Information: Be careful when sharing information about the incident on social media or with others. Publicly sharing videos or details can have unintended consequences for both the victims and the investigation. Follow legal advice on how to proceed.
Stay Safe: Your safety is paramount. If you feel that reporting the incident or being publicly associated with it could put you at risk, take steps to protect your identity. You can make anonymous reports to some organizations or hotlines.
Follow Up: Keep track of your report and stay updated on any investigations or actions taken as a result. It may be necessary to provide further information or testify if the case goes to court.

Most importantly, seek legal advice: Consider consulting with a lawyer or an attorney who specializes in civil rights or police misconduct cases. They can advise you on the best course of action and whether you should pursue legal action.

Witnessing police brutality can be a traumatic experience, and taking action requires courage and prudence. By documenting the incident and reporting it to the appropriate authorities or organizations, you contribute to accountability and the broader effort to prevent future incidents of police misconduct.

The Right to Record What You See

If you live in New York City, you have the right to record police encounters in public spaces. This right is generally protected under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and expression. Courts have interpreted this to include the right to record government officials, including police officers, in the course of their public duties.

While jurisdictional rules may differ, you can record police officers and police encounters whether or not those encounters involve police brutality. However, there are key considerations:

Do not interfere: You must not interfere with the police officers’ duties while recording. Maintain a safe and reasonable distance to ensure that you do not obstruct their ability to operate.
Public spaces: The right to record generally applies in public spaces where you lawfully have a right to be. Recording in private spaces without permission may violate privacy laws.
Visibility: It’s advisable to make it obvious that you are recording. Secretive recording could potentially lead to legal issues or confrontations with the very police officer you are filming.
Legal retention and seizure: Police officers do not have the right to delete your recordings or demand to view them without a warrant. However, in certain circumstances, a phone or camera might be seized as evidence, but this does not allow the officers to delete any recorded content.
Know the local laws: While the right to record is upheld, local laws and regulations may have specific provisions regarding recording, including audio recording. New York is a “one-party consent” state for audio recordings, meaning that only one party involved in a conversation needs to consent to the recording. However, in the context of recording or filming police, the focus is on video in public spaces where there’s no expectation of privacy.
Use of recordings: Recordings can be used as evidence in complaints or lawsuits alleging police officer misconduct or abuse. They can also be shared with media, social media, or civil rights organizations to raise awareness or seek justice in court or other legal venues.

Given the evolving nature of laws and technology, it’s also a good practice to stay informed about any changes in legislation or legal interpretations that might affect the right to record. Here, your attorney can help you understand your rights and responsibilities in regards to recording police encounters.

Call an Attorney Today

If you witness police brutality or your family members have experienced brutality or death at the hands of a law enforcement officer, you have specific legal rights. An experienced attorney can help you to preserve the record of your encounter, file with the appropriate regulatory agency, or pursue justice in the form of a legal claim.

Call an attorney today if you film police harming or killing another person during an arrest or other encounter. By coming forward with a police officer complaint, you are taking steps to prevent further abuses at the hands of police officials.

Injured on Someone Else’s Property? Your Legal Rights Explained

New York is one of the most populated cities in the world. With millions of people coming and going daily, the chances of an accident occurring are high. When you’re visiting someone, stopping for lunch at a local deli, or heading into work–what happens if you get hurt? What do you do when you’re injured on someone else’s property?

If you are injured on someone else’s property in New York, this can be considered a case of premises liability, depending on a variety of circumstances, where the property owner is held liable for any injuries that happen to you while on their property legally.

Who’s Responsible for My Injuries?

Were you walking through an apartment building to visit a friend and slipped/tripped and fell because a pipe leak caused a puddle to form on the floor? Were you grocery shopping and suffered a concussion because a ceiling tile fell of your head? Did you suffer severe burns because the gas burner on the range in the kitchen where you work is broken?

If the property owner, manager, or an employee of the property (such as in the case of a business) is negligent and that negligence caused the accident that resulted in your injury, this is a potential premises liability case, and you should seek more information from a premises liability lawyer in New York.

How Do I Prove Fault?

Proving negligence for a premises liability case can be easy or difficult, depending on the law and the amount of evidence available. So, how do you prove if the property owner is liable?

Can you prove that the property owner or manager/employee failed to provide a safe, hazard-free environment for visitors or employees? Can you prove that the management/owner knew of the dangerous conditions and did nothing to fix them, or they knew about them, did a haphazard repair that failed? Can you prove that the management/owner have ignored repeated written reports about the hazardous conditions in the workplace, the apartment building, or the place of business?

Were the property owners unaware of the dangerous condition but should have been aware because the chain of communication was broken (in the case of the manager failing to report dangerous conditions to the building owner)?

How do you prove any of those things? How can you show that the property owner ignored your right to reasonable safety while on their property?

With the advance of technology, cameras are everywhere–were there cameras there? What about witnesses? Have there been complaints from other people about the hazard that injured you?

After an accident, there are steps you should take to help gather the information and evidence you need to help prove the fault lies with the property owners.

What to do After You’re Injured on Someone Else’s Property

The first thing to do after an accident on someone else’s property is to seek medical attention immediately. Document the type of injury, get photos, ask for copies of the medical records, and speak with a medical professional to discuss any long-term effects this injury will have on your ability to work and quality of life.

If possible, while being treated at the hospital, have someone you trust take photos/videos of the scene where the accident occurred. Document these photos with the time/location of where they were taken.

Once you’ve been treated for your injuries, file a police report. After the police report, file an incident report with the management company or employer. Having these reports on file will help with your premises liability case, as well as any claim you’d like to file with the homeowners insurance company.

Seek Legal Advice

In New York City, if you were injured through no fault of your own through negligence, neglect, or carelessness by others, you may be entitled to financial compensation by filing a premises liability claim. Speaking to an experienced personal injury lawyer is critical. Your legal professional can help you to understand whether you have a case and what will happen once you file your claim.

Types of Injuries Covered by a Premises Liability Claim

Any injured person who suffered injuries because a property owner fails to adequately warn visitors about any possible danger or hazard on their property have the right to file a premises liability claim against owner. If you are on the property with the owner’s knowledge or their permission, and the incident occurred because of a dangerous condition due to their negligence, here are some of the injuries for premises liability cases which you can file a claim:

Dog Bites
Slip/Trip and Fall Injuries
Concussions/Severe Head Trauma
Broken Bones/Crush Injuries
Burns (Chemical and Fire)
Piercing Injuries/Catastrophic Internal Trauma

Filing a Premises Liability Claim

Experiencing the pain and suffering of an injury can make it difficult to deal with the aftermath of your injury, but you don’t have to deal with it alone. Contacting a New York premises liability lawyer to file a personal injury claim is the first step to righting the wrongs against you. A premises liability attorney offers a free consultation to sit down with you, discuss premises liability cases to determine if you are entitled to compensation because of your circumstances. And it is important to know that you don’t pay any attorney fee unless your attorney wins your case.

What Documentation Do I Need to File a Claim?

In order to sue the property owners for your personal injury, you need to provide your lawyer with the documentation needed to file the claim. Obtaining legal evidence is crucial in any premises liability case, and having it makes the process smoother, and will get things moving that much faster.

When you file your claim, your personal injury attorney and staff will begin to collect documentation, including:

Medical records
Witness statements
Police report/incident report
Photos/videos of where the incident occurred
Reports indicating the owner was warned of dangerous conditions
Sworn affidavits from experts/professionals about the dangers that caused the accident

When you’re on someone’s property, it’s their duty to provide a safe place for social guests, employees, or business patrons. It is their duty under the law. When they break the law, they may have to deal with financial consequences.

How Much Can I Recover for my Premises Liability Claim?

Rightfully, you may be entitled to compensation to cover medical expenses, any ongoing medical treatment, lost wages/income, the cost of emergency services and related medical bills, legal expenses, and pain and suffering. Because each case varies significantly, it can be difficult to determine settlements or judgements arising from injuries received on someone else’s property. Speak to a qualified premises liability attorney as soon as you’re physically able.

How Comparative Fault Impacts Auto Accident Claims in New York

Auto accidents happen every day in the state of New York. New York is a no-fault state, which means that when an accident happens, all claims first go through your auto insurance policy, which pays for damages regardless of who was responsible for causing the collision. However, in the case of serious injury or death, the accident victims may seek additional compensation through a lawsuit against the at-fault driver.

When seeking to sue the other driver, you’ll need to get help from an experienced personal injury attorney. The attorney will walk you through your case, give advice on what you can expect as part of the suit, and the steps that go into recovering damages from the other driver. Though you’ll have an attorney on your side, you’ll want to understand the differences between comparative fault and contributory negligence/fault in vehicle accidents in New York.

What is Comparative Fault?

The basic definition of “comparative fault” is that it is a state mandate that the amount of fault of the accident that can be attributed to each driver is then paid out in the same percentage. In layman’s terms, if you are at fault for 20% of the accident, you or your insurance company is expected to pay 20% of the damages to the other driver, and they are expected to pay the remaining 80% to you. Depending on the comparative fault attributable to you or the other party, you may recover damages or you may pay damages.

How is Fault Determined?

During the investigation into the accident, your insurance company will work to prove the other driver is at fault, but the other driver’s insurance company will work to prove that you are liable for the accident. When auto accident lawsuits go to trial, typically in no-fault states like NY, the plaintiff and defendants must give their recollections of the accident. Your personal injury attorney will ask a series of questions, using the information they’ve gathered through their own investigation to help prove that the defendant was more at fault than you were. Upon hearing the statements, the jury determines how much blame, based on the evidence your attorney provided, each of the two parties share.

How is comparative fault determined?

Consider this example:

The Red Car, the plaintiff, is pulling out of a parking lot into the street, but they fail to look both ways before doing so. The Blue Car, the defendant, hits the Red Car, causing a car accident. Who would you think is at fault for the accident? You would say that the Red Car, according to comparative fault, has all the liability for the negligence that caused the accident. But what if you learned that the driver of the Blue Car was looking over their shoulder to talk to someone in the backseat, which is considered reckless driving? Yes, the Red Car, which didn’t have right of way, pulled out in front of the Blue Car, however, the Blue Car had time to stop….IF the driver had been paying attention.

See how tricky things can be? Usually, in cases like this, the jury would likely determine that the Red Car is 70% at fault, and the Blue Car is 30% at fault, and the insurance company would pay that percentage of compensation to the other driver.

What is the Difference Between Comparative Fault and Contributory Negligence?

Comparative fault. Contributory negligence. Percentage of fault. Comparative negligence. If you’ve been in a car accident in NY, chances are you’ve heard one or all of these terms from your personal injury attorney before–and you’ve been confused. Without a knowledgeable personal injury attorney it can be confusing, because the terms are so similar, even though there are differences in the definitions. Let’s take a closer look at what each term means:

So, what is contributory negligence and how is it different than comparative fault?

The simple definition of “contributory negligence” is the failure of an injured victim (plaintiff) to act reasonably which leads to the injury to themselves and the defendants. Depending on the level of negligence determined, it may reduce the amount of compensation recovered from the defendant. If you act recklessly, and are injured because of it, and the defendant can prove that your recklessness led to your own injuries, chances are that you won’t recover damages from the defendant–even if comparative fault shows that they were at a higher percentage of fault than you.

In the example above with the Red Car and Blue Car, the Red Car’s driver may be 70% at fault, but the Blue Car’s driver’s whiplash injuries were caused because they weren’t facing forward; the Red Car’s driver does not have to pay the medical expenses for those injuries because of the Blue Car’s driver’s contributory negligence.

Types of Comparative Negligence

There are three types of comparative negligence: pure comparative negligence, modified comparative negligence, and gross comparative negligence.

Pure Comparative Negligence

The pure comparative negligence rule states that the plaintiff is allowed to recover damages if they have 99% responsibility for the car accident. New York, California, and another twelve states follow the pure contributory negligence rule.

Modified Comparative Negligence

The modified comparative negligence rules are different in that, if a plaintiff is found to be at-fault for a specific percentage of fault attributable, they cannot recover monetary damages. Ten states follow the modified comparative negligence bar of 50% responsibility. Another twenty-three states follow the bar of 51% responsibility, meaning that if the plaintiffs are found to be at comparative fault of over 50% or 51%, they cannot recover damages from the defendant in those states.

How Do I File an Auto Accident/Comparative Fault Claim in New York?

Even with an attorney by your side, recovering damages after a car accident in a comparative fault state like New York can be a marathon dotted with hurdles. Just knowing the differences between comparative fault, comparative negligence, and contributory negligence is only the beginning. Thankfully, there are experienced New York attorneys who know the ins and outs of comparative fault and comparative negligence laws, and how it applies to all parties involved.

After an accident, your first step is seeking medical help for any injuries. Medical professionals will document your injuries, which can then be used as part of a lawsuit if needed.

Your next step is contacting your insurance company to report the accident. In New York, which is a comparative negligence state, you will be required to prove the level of fault attributable to you, so that the insurance company can determine how much the other driver (defendants) are likely to recover in damages.

If you believe you are owed more in recovered damages than the other driver’s insurance company paid, you have the right to file a lawsuit against them. Holding the other driver responsible is crucial in your personal recovery, because you have those outstanding medical bills, those lost hours of work, and perhaps that lost job. Each of these represents financial hurdles that injury victims face when injured through no fault of their own.

Your most important step after the accident is to contact a personal injury attorney who will sit down with you, and help you understand comparative fault/negligence rules for New York. Thankfully, you don’t have to file the claim on you own. The attorney will do all the hard work for you, including dealing with your insurance company and the other driver’s insurance company.

Contact an experienced New York state personal injury attorney and get a free consultation to discuss your car accident. Because the laws differ from city to state and beyond, a lawyer is an essential part of the claims picture. Even if you are only partially at fault — or have no fault of your own — in an automobile accident, you may be entitled to financial compensation.